Logo-bshj
BioSocial Health J. 2(1):34-43. doi: 10.34172/bshj.49

Original Article

Menstrual hygiene and health among adolescent girls in basic schools in Fodome- Ghana

Nana Serwaa Bonsu Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft, 1 ORCID logo
Godwin Adjei Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft, 1
Elijah Kwasi Peprah Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, 1, 2, * ORCID logo
Forgive Awo Norvivor Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, 1
Jonathan Akwabeng Manu Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, 3
Ebenezer Nsiah Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, 1

Author information:
1School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences (UHAS) Hohoe, Volta Region, Ghana
2Department of Environmental Health, Accra School of Hygiene, Korle-Bu
3Ministry of Local Government, Chieftaincy and Religious Affairs, Environmental Health and Sanitation Directorate, Ghana

*Corresponding Author: Elijah Kwasi Peprah, Email: peprahelijahkwasi63@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction:

Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) is essential for the well-being of adolescent girls. The World Health Organization emphasized the importance of proper MHM to prevent infections and enhance girls’ quality of life. This study assessed the enabling environment necessary for effective menstrual hygiene practices among adolescent girls in basic schools in Fodome Township.

Methods:

An analytical cross-sectional study design was employed, utilizing a stratified random sampling approach to collect data from 318 adolescent girls. Data were gathered through structured questionnaires. Descriptive and inferential statistics were analyzed via STATA version 17.0, with logistic regression applied to examine the relationships between various variables.

Results:

Out of 318 basic school girls, 197 (62.0%) demonstrated good menstrual hygiene practices, and 205 (64.5%) had good knowledge of menstruation. Girls with access to separate toilets were 3.63 times more likely to practice good menstrual hygiene (AOR=3.63, 95% CI: 1.18–11.09, P=0.024). Additionally, the availability of dustbins in toilets increased the likelihood of good menstrual hygiene practices by more than three times (AOR=3.06, 95% CI: 1.62–5.78, P=0.001). In contrast, girls who were very dissatisfied with their menstrual products were significantly less likely to practice good menstrual hygiene (AOR=0.07, 95% CI: 0.01–0.54, P=0.011).

Conclusion:

The findings highlight suboptimal menstrual hygiene practices among adolescent girls in Fodome Township, with notable disparities in access to essential sanitary facilities.

Keywords: Menstruation, Adolescent behavior, Menstrual hygiene, Adolescent health, Sanitary products

Copyright and License Information

© 2025 The Author(s).
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Funding Statement

None.

Introduction

In low- to middle-income countries, menstrual hygiene management (MHM) is a significant public health concern, with limited access to sanitary products, insufficient knowledge about menstrual hygiene, and inadequate sanitation facilities posing threats to adolescent health.1-3 Many girls resort to unhygienic alternatives due to the unaffordability or inaccessibility of sanitary products, compounded by a lack of private, clean toilets in schools.4 Insufficient knowledge about menstrual health exacerbates this problem, leading to misconceptions and poor hygiene practices.5

Menstruation is a natural reproductive process marked by the shedding of blood through the vagina, typically beginning between the ages of 10 and 14, although it can vary from 8-17 years.6,7 Poor menstrual hygiene can result in severe health consequences, including reproductive tract infections and potential infertility.8,9 It also disrupts education, as girls may miss school during their periods, resulting in academic setbacks and perpetuating gender disparities.10,11 Proper menstrual hygiene is essential for the dignity and well-being of women and girls, ensuring both physical and emotional health during this period.12,13

Globally, over 500 million women and girls lack adequate MHM facilities.3 In countries such as India, Nepal, Bangladesh, and various sub-Saharan African nations, including Uganda, Egypt, Kenya, and Ethiopia, the prevalence of poor MHM ranges widely, highlighting the widespread challenge.5,14,15

In Ghana, studies have shown that 19.8% to 68% of adolescent girls face challenges in practicing good MHM.16 These challenges include inadequate facilities, sociocultural barriers, and economic disparities, which increase the risk of infection and educational disruption.17

In the Volta Region, menstrual hygiene challenges persist due to limited access to water and soap, and sociocultural beliefs portraying menstruation as unclean.18 Specifically, in Fodome Township, similar issues have been reported by local media, schools, and health facilities, yet no formal studies have been conducted to assess MHM practices among adolescent girls in this area.19

While research has documented MHM challenges across Ghana, significant knowledge gaps exist, particularly in rural and semi-rural settings. The Volta Region, specifically, faces unique challenges due to limited water access and persistent sociocultural beliefs about menstruation; however, in Fodome Township, despite reported challenges through local health and education authorities, no formal research has systematically assessed MHM practices among adolescent girls.19

This research gap is particularly significant because existing studies have predominantly focused on urban areas and regional capitals,18 leaving rural communities understudied. The absence of baseline data in Fodome Township hampers developing and evaluating targeted interventions. Furthermore, regional data may not accurately reflect the specific challenges faced by this community, given its unique sociocultural context.

Therefore, this study aims to assess the menstrual hygiene practices among adolescent girls in basic schools in Fodome Township and investigate the factors influencing these practices. The findings will contribute to multiple outcomes; providing crucial insights into the current MHM practices among adolescent girls in Fodome Township, documenting their challenges, coping strategies, and needs. This local data will reveal barriers such as access to sanitary products, availability of proper facilities, and the influence of cultural beliefs on menstrual practices.

Also, using this evidence, the study will facilitate the development of targeted, culturally appropriate interventions. These recommendations will span school-based solutions (like improved sanitation facilities and educational programs), community-level initiatives (including awareness programs and support systems), and healthcare service improvements. An evidence-based approach will ensure that interventions are practical and effective for the local context.

The study’s findings have several practical implications for improving MHM practices:

The study identified that poor MHM practices can lead to infections, absenteeism, and psychosocial stress. Therefore, public health policies should emphasize improving MHM resources and support services in schools to promote girls’ health and educational outcomes.

Also, the study highlighted a gap in menstrual health knowledge among some girls, underscoring the need for continuous education on menstrual hygiene, dispelling myths and addressing cultural taboos. Integrating menstrual health education into the school curriculum could enhance knowledge and reduce stigma.

Furthermore, limited access to affordable menstrual products was a challenge for many girls. Subsidizing menstrual products or establishing free distribution programs could help girls manage menstruation more comfortably and hygienically.

Lastly, since access to private toilets and dustbins significantly influenced good MHM practices, schools should prioritize the provision of clean, private, and adequately equipped sanitation facilities. This includes installing dustbins for proper disposal and ensuring access to water and soap.


Methods

Study area

Fodome is a traditional area in the Hohoe Municipality of the Volta region, bordering Togo to the east, southeast of the Afadzato district, southwest of Kpando Municipality, and north of the Jasikan district (Ghana Statistical Service, 2021). The area consists of 14 communities primarily inhabited by Ewes, who practice Christianity, Islam, and traditional religion. The study focused on five selected subcommunities—Fodome Helu, Woe, Hloma, Amele, and Ahor—due to the presence of basic schools, these subcommunities are suitable for assessing menstrual hygiene practices among adolescent girls. These communities have an estimated population of 6431, with most residents engaged in farming and fishing(Ghana Statistical Service, 2021).

Participants and procedure

Type of study

A school-based analytical cross-sectional study was conducted to assess menstrual hygiene practices. This design was suitable for capturing a snapshot of practices and related factors.

Sampling

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The study included adolescent girls aged 10-19 years who were menstruating, able to understand English or the local dialect, and who consented to participate with parental or guardian approval. Adolescent girls (ages 10-19) are typically the primary focus of studies related to menstrual hygiene because this is the stage when they experience menarche and begin managing menstruation regularly. Involving them will allow the researcher to gather in-depth knowledge about the subject matter.

Girls who had not started menstruating and those with serious health conditions or communication impairments were excluded from the study since they would not be in a condition to provide adequate knowledge.

Sample size determination

The sample size for this study was 318 adolescent girls, calculated using the Cochran formula (1977).

Sampling method

A stratified random sampling approach was utilized to select respondents for the study on menstrual hygiene practices among adolescent girls in basic schools in Fodome Township. The Principal Investigator began by dividing the five basic schools in Fodome Township into distinct strata. Each school represented a separate stratum, ensuring that all educational institutions within the township were included in the sampling framework. Sample sizes were allocated to each school proportionally based on the total number of students enrolled and the calculated sample size for each stratum. Within each selected school, individual students were chosen via simple random sampling techniques. This involved creating a list of eligible adolescent girls and using random number generators to select participants, ensuring that each student had an equal chance of being included in the study. Once the participants were selected, data collection was carried out directly in the schools. This method ensured that the sample accurately represented the student population across all three schools.

Data collection tool and procedure

Data collection was conducted by three trained research assistants and the principal investigator using a structured questionnaire to assess menstrual hygiene practices and related factors among adolescent girls. The questionnaire, with a Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient of 0.742, was pretested among girls in Hohoe Township to ensure clarity and appropriateness, and to familiarize the data collectors with ethical practices.

The questionnaire comprised four sections:

  1. Sociodemographic information: This section of the questionnaire collected data about the participants’ background, such as age, grade level. Sociodemographic information is essential for contextualizing the findings and understanding how various factors might influence menstrual hygiene practices. The sociodemographic section is considered to have face validity as it captures basic demographic information relevant to the study. The questions are straightforward and relevant to the research goals. Since these items are straightforward demographic questions, they are expected to be highly reliable.

  2. Menstrual hygiene practices: This section aimed to gather information on how adolescent girls manage their menstrual hygiene, including the materials used for menstrual protection, frequency of changing pads, and disposal methods. The goal was to identify common practices and evaluate their effectiveness. The items were designed to directly assess menstrual hygiene behaviors and are thus considered to have content validity. The questions are based on established practices and norms around menstrual hygiene. A reliability coefficient of 0.742 for the overall questionnaire suggests that the menstrual hygiene practices section is reasonably reliable in capturing consistent responses across participants.

  3. Knowledge of menstrual hygiene: This scale assessed the level of knowledge the adolescent girls had about menstrual hygiene, including understanding the importance of hygiene during menstruation and the potential health risks associated with poor menstrual hygiene. The scale has face validity, as the items are directly related to the participants’ knowledge of menstrual hygiene, a key component of the study. To ensure the validity of the knowledge, the questions were aligned with established menstrual health guidelines. While the Cronbach’s alpha for the overall questionnaire is 0.742, the reliability of the knowledge scale could be stronger if items measuring various aspects of menstrual hygiene knowledge were more diverse.

  4. Challenges faced: This scale aimed to identify the challenges adolescent girls face regarding MHM. These challenges could include limited access to sanitary products, cultural taboos, lack of knowledge, and stigma. The challenge scale has content validity as it addresses specific barriers identified in previous research on menstrual hygiene. The items are reflective of real-world difficulties faced by adolescent girls. Given that the items are designed to capture varied challenges, the scale’s reliability will likely moderate, depending on the diversity of responses and the consistency with which respondents identify their challenges.

Informed consent was obtained from participants and guardians, and data collectors were trained to maintain confidentiality and respect throughout data collection

Measures

To generate a composite hygiene practice score, all ‘No’ and ‘Don’t know’ responses were combined as ‘NO’. Eight items were used to generate the score, with the lowest possible score of “0” and the highest score of “10.” The average score was found to be 6. Therefore, respondents who scored below the average were considered to have poor menstrual hygiene practices, whereas those who scored average and above were considered to have good menstrual hygiene practices. Similarly, to generate a composite knowledge score, all ‘No’ and ‘Don’t Know’ responses were combined as ‘NO’. Eight items were used to generate the score, with the lowest possible score of 0 and the highest score of 8. The average score was found to be 4. Respondents who scored below the average were considered to have poor knowledge of menstrual hygiene, whereas those who scored the average and above were considered to have good understanding of menstrual hygiene.

Data analysis/statistics

The data collected were compiled and entered into EpiData software version 4.0. After data entry, the data were exported into STATA 17.0 for analysis. Data cleaning and validation were performed to ensure data quality before analysis. Descriptive statistics such as frequencies and proportions were performed for categorical variables, whereas means and standard deviations were computed for continuous variables and are presented in tables and charts. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between menstrual hygiene practices and various independent variables, with statistical significance determined at a P value of 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval.


Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of basic school girls in Fodome Township

In the study involving 318 primary school girls with a mean age of 13 years ( ± 1.64), half (50%) were aged 13–14 years, and 38.4% were in Basic 8. Most participants were Ewes (64.8%) and identified as Christians (83.6%). A majority (61.6%) lived with their parents. Regarding parental education, 30.2% of fathers had no formal education, while 43.1% of mothers had a basic education. Nearly all (93.7%) had received information on menstruation management before menarche, with mothers being the main source for 59.4% of them (Table 1).


Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of basic school girls in Fodome Township (N = 318)
Variable Frequency Percent
Mean age (SD)  ± 13.0 (1.64)
Age
10-12 103 32.4
13-14 159 50.0
15-16 56 17.6
Class category
Basic 6 96 30.2
Basic 7 100 31.4
Basic 8 122 38.4
Ethnicity
Akan 31 9.8
Ewe 206 64.8
Ga/Adange 14 4.4
Guan 18 5.6
Others 49 15.4
Religion
Christianity 266 83.6
Islam 52 16.4
Currently lives with
Mother only 68 21.4
Father only 10 3.1
Parents 196 61.6
Guardian 44 13.8
Father’s educational level
No formal education 96 30.2
Basic education 91 28.6
Secondary education 87 27.4
Tertiary 44 13.8
Mother’s educational level
No formal education 60 18.9
Basic education 137 43.1
Secondary education 68 21.4
Tertiary 53 16.6
Receipt of information on menstruation management before menarche
No 20 6.3
Yes 298 93.7
The initial source of information on menstruation management
Relative 10 3.1
Friends 17 5.4
Mother 189 59.4
School 102 32.1

Knowledge of menstruation and the menstrual cycle among basic school girls in Fodome township

The majority of respondents, 293 (92.1%), recognized menstruation as a natural process, with 268 (84.3%) correctly identifying its cause. Most reported a menstrual flow of 5–6 days (n = 203, 63.8%) and a cycle length of 26–30 days (n = 141, 44.3%). While 217 (68.2%) did not associate menstruation with foul odor, 298 (93.7%) viewed menstrual blood as unhygienic. Additionally, 286 (89.9%) knew that menstruation indicated a girl’s ability to conceive, and 253 (79.6%) preferred disposable sanitary pads (Table 2).


Table 2. Knowledge of menstruation and the menstrual cycle among basic school girls in Fodome township
Variable Frequency Percent
What is menstruation?
Natural process 293 7.9
Don’t know 25 92.1
Causes of menstruation
Natural process 268 84.3
Caused by disease 21 6.6
Don’t know 29 9.1
The average duration of menstrual flow
4 days 69 21.7
5-6 days 203 63.8
7 days 46 14.5
Average menstrual cycle
25 days 136 42.8
26-30 days 141 44.3
 > 30 days 41 12.9
Foul odor during menstruation
Yes 101 31.8
No 217 68.2
Menstrual blood is unhygienic
Yes 298 93.7
No 20 6.3
The onset of menstruation is a sign that a girl can get pregnant from unprotected sex.
No 32 10.1
Yes 286 89.9
Safe menstrual products
Disposable sanitary pads 253 79.6
Reusable cloth 33 10.4
Cotton wool 14 4.4
Don’t know 18 5.7

Menstrual hygiene practices among adolescent girls in basic schools in the Fodome township

The majority, 259 (81.4%), used disposable sanitary pads during their last menstrual period, and 182 (57.2%) changed their sanitary products twice daily. Nearly all 314 (98.7%) bathed twice a day. While 200 (62.9%) did not change sanitary products at school due to a lack of functional toilets, 118 (37.1%) used a school washroom. For menstrual tracking, 133 (41.8%) used a calendar, and 121 (38.1%) used a diary or other book (Table 3).


Table 3. Menstrual hygiene practices among adolescent girls in basic schools in the Fodome township
Variable Frequency Percentage
Sanitary products used during the last menstrual period
Cotton wool 14 4.4
Disposable sanitary pads 259 81.4
Reusable cloth/rags 45 14.2
Frequency of changing sanitary products per day during the last menstrual period
1 time 12 3.8
2 times 182 57.2
3 times 105 33.0
4 times 19 6.0
Frequency of bathing per day during the last menstrual period
Once 4 1.3
Twice 314 98.7
Handwashing habits before changing sanitary product
Always 229 72.0
Often 26 8.2
Sometimes 46 14.5
Rarely 17 5.3
Change of sanitary products during school hours
Yes 118 37.1
No 200 62.9
If yes, where sanitary products were changed during school hours(n = 118)
School washroom 118 100.0
Uncompleted buildings/unused classes 0 0
Surrounding bush/farms 0 0
If not, the reason for not changing sanitary products during school hours (n = 200)
No functional toilets or changing rooms at the school 116 58.0
No locks on available toilet doors 6 3.0
School toilets are smelly and unkempt 62 31.0
Others 16 8.0
The method used to track the next menstrual period.
Marking on the calendar 133 41.8
Use of dairy or other books 121 38.1
None 64 20.1

Availability of sanitary facilities in basic schools in the Fodome township

In a survey of basic schools, 84.0% had toilet facilities, predominantly latrine pits (90.6%) compared to water closets (9.4%). Only 9.4% of toilets had water access, and just 13.1% provided soap. Most schools (86.9%) offered separate toilets for girls, though 13.1% did not. Doors were present in 79.0% of toilets, and 88.4% were roofed. Dustbins for waste disposal were available in 39.3% of the toilets, while 60.7% lacked them (Table 4).


Table 4. Availability of sanitary facilities in basic schools in the Fodome township
Variable Frequency Percent
Availability of toilet facilities
Yes 267 84.0
No 51 16.0
Type of toilet facility is there(n = 267)
Latrine pits 242 90.6
Water Closet 25 9.4
Availability of water in the toilet
Yes 25 9.4
No 242 90.6
Availability of soap in the toilets
Yes 35 13.1
No 232 86.9
Separate toilets for girls
Yes 232 86.9
No 35 13.1
Doors are in place
Yes 211 79.0
No 56 21.0
Toilets are roofed
Yes 236 88.4
No 31 11.6
Dustbins are available in the toilet.
Yes 105 39.3
No 162 60.7

Preferred menstrual hygiene products among adolescent girls in basic schools in the Fodome township

Most adolescent girls in basic schools used disposable sanitary pads (88.0%), with a small percentage using alternatives like cotton wool, reusable cloths, or tissue paper. While 95.9% found their product comfortable, only 23.6% reported easy access, and 35.8% considered it affordable. Ease of use and absence of side effects were noted by 41.2% and 43.4%, respectively. Parental and peer influences on product choice were minimal. Satisfaction with menstrual hygiene products varied, with 33.6% satisfied or very satisfied and 28.6% dissatisfied (Table 5).


Table 5. Preferred menstrual hygiene products among adolescent girls in basic schools in the Fodome township
Variable Frequency Percent
Menstrual hygiene products are primarily used
Cotton wool 20 6.3
Disposable sanitary pads 280 88.0
Reusable cloth/rags 12 3.8
Tissue paper 6 1.9
Reasons for preference
Comfortable
Yes 305 95.9
No 13 4.1
Availability
Yes 75 23.6
No 243 76.4
Very affordable
Yes 114 35.8
No 204 64.2
Easy to use
Yes 131 41.2
No 187 58.8
Do not have any side effects.
Yes 138 43.4
No 180 56.6
Parental guidance
Yes 38 12.0
No 280 88.0
Peer influence
Yes 8 2.5
No 310 97.5
Satisfaction with your current menstrual hygiene product
Very satisfied 32 10.6
Satisfied 73 23.0
Neutral 122 38.4
Dissatisfied 69 21.7
Very dissatisfied 22 6.9

Associations between sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge of menstrual hygiene and the menstrual cycle, and menstrual hygiene practices among adolescent girls in basic schools in the Fodome township

In a binary logistic regression analysis, factors such as age, class, ethnicity, religion, living arrangements, parental education, and knowledge about menstruation were assessed. The multivariable analysis revealed that adolescent girls living with their fathers were significantly more likely (AOR = 5.22) to practice good menstrual hygiene than those living only with their mothers. Girls living with guardians were twice as likely (AOR = 2.04) to have good practices, though this was not statistically significant. Additionally, girls with good menstruation knowledge were 1.6 times more likely to practice good hygiene, though this association was also not statistically significant.

Association between the availability of sanitary facilities in basic schools, preferred menstrual hygiene products and menstrual hygiene practices among adolescent girls in basic schools in the Fodome township

In a logistic regression analysis, factors influencing MHM practices were assessed. The adjusted model showed that girls with access to separate toilets were significantly more likely (AOR = 3.63) to have good MHM practices. The presence of dustbins in toilets also increased good MHM likelihood by more than three times (AOR = 3.06). Conversely, girls who were very dissatisfied with their menstrual products were significantly less likely to maintain good MHM practices (AOR = 0.07).


Discussion

This study aimed to assess MHM practices among girls in Fodome township’s basic schools and identify influencing factors. Findings showed that 62.0% of respondents reported good MHM practices (Table 6), aligning with similar studies yet showing higher rates than those from Harari (44.2%), Ambo (46.7%),20 and southern Ethiopia (39.7%),10 but lower than in Hararge (58.3%),21 and Northeast Ethiopia (52.9%). In Ghana, a North Gonja District study reported 64.5% of girls using sanitary pads and 71.0% exhibiting adequate MHM practices,22 while 84.9% practiced good MHM in the West Gonja Municipality despite access challenges.23


Table 6. Association between sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge of menstrual hygiene and the menstrual cycle, and menstrual hygiene practices among adolescent girls in basic schools in the Fodome township
Variable MH Practice level Unadjusted Adjusted
Good No. (%) Poor No. (%) aOR (95% CI) P value aOR (95% CI) P value
Age
10-12 67 (34.0) 36 (29.8) Ref
13-14 97 (49.2) 62 (52.2) 1.19 (0.71-2.00) 0.509
15-16 33 (16.8) 23 (19.0) 1.30 (0.66-2.53) 0.446
Class Category
Basic 6 57 (28.9) 38 (32.2) Ref
Basic 7 69 (35.0) 31 (25.6) 0.66 (0.36-1.18) 0.161
Basic 8 71 (36.0) 51 (42.2) 1.05 (0.61-1.81) 0.861
Ethnicity
Akan 19 (9.6) 12 (9.9) Ref
Ewe 131 (66.5) 75 (62.0) 0.91 (0.42-1.97) 0.804
Ga/Adange 7 (3.6) 7 (5.8) 1.58 (0.44-5.65) 0.479
Guan 10 (5.1) 8 (6.6) 1.27 (0.39-4.11) 0.694
Others 30 (15.2) 19 (15.7) 1.00 (0.40-2.52) 0.995
Religion
Christianity 166 (84.3) 100 (82.6) Ref
Islam 31 (15.7) 21 (17.4) 1.12 (0.61-2.06) 0.705
Currently lives with
Mother only 47 (23.9) 21 (17.4) Ref
Father only 3 (1.5) 7 (5.8) 5.22 (1.23-22.2) 0.025
Parents 124 (62.9) 72 (59.5) 1.30 (0.72-2.35) 0.385
Guardian 23 (11.7) 21 (17.4) 2.04 (0.93-4.48) 0.074
Father’s educational level
No formal education 55 (27.9) 41 (33.9) Ref
Basic education 62 (31.5) 29 (24.0) 0.63 (0.35-1.14) 0.127
Secondary education 53 (26.9) 34 (28.1) 0.86 (0.48-1.55) 0.618
Tertiary 27 (13.7) 17 (14.0) 0.75 (0.41-1.75) 0.650
Mother’s educational level
No formal education 41 (20.8) 19 (15.7) Ref
Basic education 85 (43.2) 52 (43.0) 1.32 (0.69-2.51) 0.398
Secondary education 40 (20.3) 28 (23.1) 1.51 (0.73-3.13) 0.266
Tertiary 31 (15.7) 22 (18.2) 1.53 (0.71-3.31) 0.279
Receipt of information on menstruation management before menarche
No 15 (7.6) 5 (4.1) Ref
Yes 182 (92.4) 116 (95.9) 1.91 (0.68-5.40) 0.221
Initial source of information on menstruation management
Relative 4 (2.0) 6 (5.0) Ref Ref
Friends 7 (3.6) 10 (8.3) 0.95 (0.19-4.68) 0.952 1.27 (0.22-7.17) 0.787
Mother 128 (65.0) 61 (50.4) 0.21 (0.08-1.17) 0.084 0.74 (0.34-1.61) 0.444
School 58 (29.4) 44 (36.4) 0.33 (0.13-1.90) 0.313 1.11 (0.37-3.35) 0.846
Knowledge Level
Poor knowledge 80 (40.6) 33 (25.0) Ref Ref
Good knowledge 117 (59.4) 72 (75.0) 1.82 (1.12-2.98) 0.016 1.61 (0.86-2.99) 0.135

aOR, adjusted odds ratio

The variation in MHM across regions is attributed to socioeconomic conditions, educational programs, and the availability of WASH facilities, which are often inadequate in certain areas. Despite Fodome limitations, relatively high MHM practices may reflect better awareness and access to menstrual products and WASH (Table 7). Poor MHM is linked to negative outcomes like reproductive tract infections, school absenteeism, and psychosocial stress, underscoring the need for interventions to improve access to sanitary products, menstrual health education, and school facilities. Community engagement and cultural sensitivity are also crucial for sustainable improvements.


Table 7. Association between the availability of sanitary facilities in basic schools, preferred menstrual hygiene products and menstrual hygiene practices among adolescent girls in basic schools in the Fodome township
Variable MH practice level Unadjusted Adjusted
Good No. (%) Poor No. (%) cOR (95% CI) P value aOR (95% CI) P value
Availability of toilet facilities
No 27 (12.2) 24 (25.0) Ref -
Yes 195 (87.8) 72 (75.0) 0.48 (0.26-0.88) 0.018 -
Type of toilet facility is there (n = 267)
Latrine pits 174 (89.2) 68 (94.4) Ref
Water closet 21 (10.8) 4 (5.6) 1.04 (0.44-2.45) 0.930
Availability of water in the toilet
No 178 (91.3) 64 (88.9) Ref
Yes 17 (8.7) 8 (11.1) 1.51 (0.65-3.46) 0.336
Availability of soap in the toilets
No 170 (87.2) 62 (86.1) Ref
Yes 25 (12.8) 10 (13.9) 1.45 (0.71-2.99) 0.311
Separate toilet for girls
No Ref Ref
Yes 3.73 (1.40-9.98) 0.009 3.63 (1.18-11.09) 0.024
Doors are in place
No 45 (23.1) 11 (15.3) Ref
Yes 150 (76.9) 61 (84.7) 1.47 (0.77-2.79) 0.244
Toilets are roofed
Yes 168 (86.2) 68 (94.4) Ref
No 27 (13.9) 4 (5.6) 2.00 (0.83-4.84) 0.123
Dustbins are available in the toilet
No 137 (70.3) 25 (34.7) Ref Ref
Yes 58 (29.7) 47 (65.3) 3.01 (1.79-5.07) < 0.001 3.06 (1.62-5.78) 0.001
Reasons for preference
Comfortable
No 12 (5.4) 1 (1.0) Ref
Yes 210 (94.6) 95 (99.0) 1.40 (0.42-4.65) 0.582
Availability
No 167 (75.2) 76 (79.2) Ref
Yes 55 (24.8) 20 (20.8) 0.89 (0.52-1.53) 0.676
Very affordable
No 140 (63.1) 64 (66.7) Ref
Yes 82 (36.9) 32 (33.3) 0.98 (0.61-1.57) 0.928
Easy to use
Yes 87 (39.2) 44 (45.8) Ref
No 135 (60.8) 52 (54.2) 1.48 (0.94-2.34) 0.094
Do not have any side effects
Yes 94 (42.3) 44 (45.8) Ref
No 128 (57.7) 52 (54.2) 1.42 (0.90-2.24) 0.131
Parental guidance
Yes 23 (10.4) 15 (15.6) Ref
No 199 (89.6) 81 (84.4) 1.55 (0.78-3.06) 0.210
Peer influence
Yes 5 (2.3) 3 (3.1) Ref
No 217 (97.8) 93 (96.9) 0.98 (0.23-4.16) 0.974
Satisfaction with your current menstrual hygiene product
Very satisfied 16 (8.1) 16 (13.2) Ref Ref
Satisfied 48 (24.4) 25 (20.7) 0.52 (0.22-1.21) 0.130 0.31 (0.09-1.09) 0.068
Neutral 74 (37.6) 48 (39.7) 0.65 (0.30-1.42) 0.278 0.50 (0.14-1.79) 0.289
Dissatisfied 39 (19.8) 30 (24.8) 0.77 (0.33-1.78) 0.541 0.48 (0.13-1.72) 0.263
Very dissatisfied 20 (10.2) 2 (1.7) 0.10 (0.12-0.50) 0.005 0.07 (0.01-0.54) 0.011

aOR, adjusted odds ratio; cOR, Crude odds ratios

The study further found that 64.5% of girls had good menstruation knowledge, consistent with findings from North Gonja (78.8%), Mohammed et al22 and West Gonja (63.7%),23 while Ethiopia reported slightly higher knowledge levels (72.5%).24 In Nepal, widespread awareness was marred by misconceptions.25 Educational interventions and cultural beliefs heavily influence menstruation knowledge, with efforts across Ghana and Ethiopia aiming to enhance menstrual health education, whereas stigma in Nepal hinders effective information dissemination. Access to separate toilets was associated with a higher likelihood of good MHM practices (AOR = 3.63), consistent with studies in Ghana’s Savannah Region showing that private sanitation facilitates proper MHM,23 and in Kenya, where inadequate facilities contribute to unsafe practices and absenteeism.26 However, disparities in sanitation access remain, with economic limitations impacting MHM infrastructure, particularly in rural Ethiopia and Nepal.25

These findings underscore the need for improved school sanitation facilities to support MHM and mitigate public health impacts, including infections and psychosocial challenges. Recommendations include prioritizing school infrastructure improvements, ensuring water and soap availability, and integrating MHM awareness programs into broader health initiatives. By fostering a supportive environment for managing menstruation, girls can experience better health outcomes, reduced absenteeism, and greater educational participation.


Study limitations

The cross-sectional nature of the study limits its ability to establish causality or observe changes over time. Nonresponse bias is a concern, as nonrespondents may differ from respondents. Self-reported data may be inaccurate due to response bias.


Conclusion

The study revealed that good menstrual hygiene practices among adolescent girls in Fodome Township are significantly influenced by access to proper facilities and quality menstrual products. Girls with access to separate toilets and dustbins are much more likely to practice good hygiene, whereas dissatisfaction with menstrual products hinders proper practices. Improving access to sanitary facilities and providing affordable, high-quality menstrual products are essential to support better MHM in this community.


Implication of the study for practice

The study’s findings have several practical implications for improving MHM practices:

The study identified that poor MHM practices can lead to infections, absenteeism, and psychosocial stress. Therefore, public health policies should emphasize improving MHM resources and support services in schools to promote girls’ health and educational outcomes.

Also, the study highlighted a gap in menstrual health knowledge among some girls, underscoring the need for continuous education on menstrual hygiene, dispelling myths and addressing cultural taboos. Integrating menstrual health education into the school curriculum could enhance knowledge and reduce stigma.

Furthermore, limited access to affordable menstrual products was a challenge for many girls. Subsidizing menstrual products or establishing free distribution programs could help girls manage menstruation more comfortably and hygienically.

Lastly, since access to private toilets and dustbins significantly influenced good MHM practices, schools should prioritize the provision of clean, private, and adequately equipped sanitation facilities. This includes installing dustbins for proper disposal and ensuring access to water and soap.


Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.


Ethical Approval

Approval for this study was obtained from the University of Health and Allied Sciences Research Ethics Committee, with approval number UHAS-REC A.4[092] 23-24. Written permission was also obtained from the Hohoe Municipal Ghana Education Directorate and the heads of the selected basic schools. Before data collection, written informed consent was obtained from both the participants and their parents or guardians. To ensure confidentiality and anonymity, all questionnaires were coded, and personal identifiers were removed. The completed questionnaires were stored securely under lock and key and were accessible only to the research team. All research activities adhered to relevant ethical guidelines and regulations to safeguard participants’ rights and data privacy.


Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their gratitude to all participants for their valuable contributions to this study. Special thanks also go to the Hohoe Municipal Education Service and Health Directorate for granting permission to conduct the study and to the guardians for their cooperation and support. We would also like to thank the editor of this journal for the tremendous effort.


References

  1. Esmaealpour A, Sharma M, Mirghafourvand M, Pourrazavi S, Allahverdipour H. Mother-daughter’s relationship with menstrual hygiene and premenstrual symptoms in Iranian teenage girls. J Educ Community Health 2022; 9(3):140-7. doi: 10.34172/jech.2022.21 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  2. Sahiledengle B, Atlaw D, Kumie A, Tekalegn Y, Woldeyohannes D, Agho KE. Menstrual hygiene practice among adolescent girls in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2022; 17(1):e0262295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262295 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  3. UNICEF. Menstrual health and hygiene. The World Bank. 2022. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/water/brief/menstrual-health-and-hygiene.
  4. Mohammed S, Larsen-Reindorf RE. Menstrual knowledge, sociocultural restrictions, and barriers to menstrual hygiene management in Ghana: evidence from a multi-method survey among adolescent schoolgirls and schoolboys. PLoS One 2020; 15(10):e0241106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241106 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  5. Faizi N, Kazmi S. Universal health coverage - there is more to it than meets the eye. J Family Med Prim Care 2017; 6(1):169-70. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_13_17 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  6. Lacroix AE, Langaker MD. Physiology, menarche. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2019.
  7. Marques P, Madeira T, Gama A. Menstrual cycle among adolescents: girls’ awareness and influence of age at menarche and overweight. Rev Paul Pediatr 2022; 40:e2020494. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2022/40/2020494 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  8. Majeed J, Sharma P, Ajmera P, Dalal K. Menstrual hygiene practices and associated factors among Indian adolescent girls: a meta-analysis. Reprod Health 2022; 19(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01453-3 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  9. Ha MA, Alam MZ. Menstrual hygiene management practice among adolescent girls: an urban-rural comparative study in Rajshahi division, Bangladesh. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01665-6 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  10. Tegegne TK, Sisay MM. Menstrual hygiene management and school absenteeism among female adolescent students in Northeast Ethiopia. BMC Public Health 2014; 14:1118. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1118 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  11. Miiro G, Rutakumwa R, Nakiyingi-Miiro J, Nakuya K, Musoke S, Namakula J. Menstrual health and school absenteeism among adolescent girls in Uganda (MENISCUS): a feasibility study. BMC Womens Health 2018; 18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0502-z [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  12. House S, Mahon T, Cavill S. Menstrual hygiene matters: a resource for improving menstrual hygiene around the world. Reprod Health Matters 2013; 21(41):257-9. [ Google Scholar]
  13. Budhathoki SS, Bhattachan M, Castro-Sánchez E, Sagtani RA, Rayamajhi RB, Rai P. Menstrual hygiene management among women and adolescent girls in the aftermath of the earthquake in Nepal. BMC Womens Health 2018; 18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0527-y [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  14. Yadav RN, Joshi S, Poudel R, Pandeya P. Knowledge, attitude, and practice on menstrual hygiene management among school adolescents. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2018; 15(3):212-6. doi: 10.3126/jnhrc.v15i3.18842 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  15. Mathenge MW, Midigo R. Still grappling with menstrual hygiene: explaining uptake by socio-cultural factors among school going girls in Kenya. J Obstet Gynecol Surg 2020; 1(1):1-6. doi: 10.52916/jogs204002 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  16. Asumah MN. Determinants of Menstrual Hygiene Management Practices Among Adolescent Girls in Basic Schools in the West Gonja Municipality of the Savannah Region of Ghana [dissertation]. Tamale: University for Development Studies; 2020.
  17. Charani E, Mendelson M, Ashiru-Oredope D, Hutchinson E, Kaur M, McKee M. Navigating sociocultural disparities in relation to infection and antibiotic resistance-the need for an intersectional approach. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2021; 3(4):dlab123. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab123 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  18. Kabila A. Domestic water supply, sanitation and health in rural Ghana: perspectives from Nkwanta district. Ghana J Geogr 2010; 2:163-93. [ Google Scholar]
  19. Kpodo L, Aberese-Ako M, Axame WK, Adjuik M, Gyapong M. Socio-cultural factors associated with knowledge, attitudes and menstrual hygiene practices among junior high school adolescent girls in the Kpando district of Ghana: a mixed method study. PLoS One 2022; 17(10):e0275583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275583 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  20. Worku Y, Kassa GM, Mekonen B, Desta M, Bishaw KA, Gedfaw M. Menstrual hygiene management practice and associated factors among high school and preparatory school adolescent students in Debre Markos town, Northwest, Ethiopia: a mixed-method study. BMC Womens Health 2024; 24(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03265-y [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  21. Mekonnen M, Asefa T. Knowledge, attitude and practice of breast self-examination among female undergraduate nursing students at University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Sciences. Hosp Palliat Med Int J 2019; 3(5):167-73. doi: 10.15406/hpmij.2019.03.00173 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  22. Mohammed S, Larsen-Reindorf RE, Awal I. Menstrual hygiene management and school absenteeism among adolescents in Ghana: results from a school-based cross-sectional study in a rural community. Int J Reprod Med 2020; 2020:6872491. doi: 10.1155/2020/6872491 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  23. Asumah MN, Adnani QE, Dzantor EK, Beig MA, Wuffele GM, Donkor DR, et al. Menstruation-related school absenteeism: an urban centre study in the northern region of Ghana. Women. 2023 3(4):497-507. doi: 10.3390/women3040038.
  24. Bulto GA. Knowledge on menstruation and practice of menstrual hygiene management among school adolescent girls in central Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2021; 14:911-23. doi: 10.2147/rmhp.S296670 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  25. Singh A, Chakrabarty M, Singh S, Chandra R, Chowdhury S, Singh A. Menstrual hygiene practices among adolescent women in rural India: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2022; 22(1):2126. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14622-7 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  26. Korir E, Okwara FN, Okumbe G. Menstrual hygiene management practices among primary school girls from a pastoralist community in Kenya: a cross sectional survey. Pan Afr Med J 2018; 31:222. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.31.222.13521 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
Submitted: 21 Nov 2024
Accepted: 04 Feb 2025
First published online: 17 Mar 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - FireFox Plugin)

Abstract View: 415
PDF Download: 475
Full Text View: 24